Comparison of therapeutic outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A prospective observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) may not always receive resection despite the possible achievement of a pathologic complete response (pCR) being associated with superior survival benefit. We aimed to compare outcomes among ESCC patients with or without pCR and those refusing surgery. METHODS: In total, 111 medically operable, non-cervical ESCC patients after the same protocol of nCRT (platinum/5-fluorouracil plus radiation 50Gy) were prospectively enrolled between 2011 and 2021. Eighty-three of them underwent esophagectomy comprising pCR (n = 32) and non-pCR (n = 51), while 28 operable patients declined surgery (refusal-of-surgery group). Predictors and survival data were analyzed. RESULTS: In terms of esophagectomy, 38.5% (32/83) patients achieved pCR. The pCR group exhibited better pretreatment performance status than the non-pCR group (adjusted odds ratio: 0.11, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.58; p = 0.01). Among pCR, non-pCR, and refusal-of-surgery groups, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 56%, 29% and 50% (p = 0.08) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 52%, 28% and 36% (p = 0.07) respectively. The pCR group had significantly better OS and PFS than the non-PCR group (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.33 and 1.93, p = 0.02 and 0.049 respectively) but not the refusal-of-surgery group. CONCLUSION: Better pretreatment performance status is associated with higher chance of pCR. Consistent with previous studies, we found attainment of pCR confers the best OS and PFS. Suboptimal OS in the refusal-of-surgery group reflects some of them would have residual disease in addition to complete remission. Further studies are needed to identify prognostic factors of pCR to select candidates who could validly decline esophagectomy.

Mucin 4 Confers Gemcitabine Resistance and an Unfavorable Prognosis in Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma via AKT Activation.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) exhibits aggressive biological behavior and a poor prognosis. Gemcitabine (GEM)-based chemotherapy is the first-line chemotherapy for advanced CCA but has a response rate of only 20-30%. Therefore, investigating treatments to overcome GEM resistance in advanced CCA is crucial. Among mucin (MUC) family members, MUC4 showed the greatest increase in the resistant versus parental sublines. MUC4 was upregulated in whole-cell lysates and conditioned media from gemcitabine-resistant (GR) CCA sublines. MUC4 mediated GEM resistance by activating AKT signaling in GR CCA cells. The MUC4-AKT axis induced BAX S184 phosphorylation to inhibit apoptosis and downregulated GEM transporter human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) expression. The combination of AKT inhibitors and GEM or afatinib overcame GEM resistance in CCA. In vivo, capivasertib (an AKT inhibitor) increased GEM sensitivity in GR cells. MUC4 promoted EGFR and HER2 activation to mediate GEM resistance. Finally, MUC4 expression in patient plasma correlated with MUC4 expression. Paraffin-embedded specimens from non-responders expressed significantly more MUC4 than did those from responders, and this upregulation was associated with poor progression-free survival and overall survival. In GR CCA, high MUC4 expression promotes sustained EGFR/HER2 signaling and AKT activation. The combination of AKT inhibitors with GEM or afatinib might overcome GEM resistance.

Immunoprofile of adenosquamous carcinoma in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gastric adenosquamous carcinoma (GASC) is a rare subtype of gastric cancer. Research on GASC treatment is limited, and its outcome is usually poor. We investigated the clinical features, immunoprofile of GASC, and determined the optimal treatment modality for these patients. METHODS: Patients with GASC from Taipei Veterans General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical features and treatment outcomes were evaluated. Adequate samples were examined for surrogate biomarkers for immunotherapy by IHC staining. RESULTS: Total 14 (0.35%) GASC patients were found among 4034 gastric cancer patients. The median tumor size was 6.8 cm in 10 patients with stage III GASC, and all these patients underwent radical gastrectomy followed by adjuvant therapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.0 and 11.5 months, respectively. Two patients with stage IV GASC received frontline immunotherapy. Their median PFS and OS were 9.0 and 12.5 months. In immunoprofiling, 25.0% (n = 3), 75.0% (n = 9), and 33.3% (n = 4) of the samples had deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) protein, combined positive score (CPS) of ≥1, and CPS of ≥10, respectively. The univariate analysis revealed that programmed death-ligand 1 ≥5% (HR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.01-0.97; p = 0.047) was significant associated with superior OS. One stage IV patient with CPS ≥10 and dMMR proteins received nivolumab monotherapy as frontline treatment that resulted 14-month PFS. CONCLUSION: Patients with GASC are more likely to yield positive results for CPS and dMMR. Biomarkers should be examined, and immunotherapy can be considered as frontline systemic treatment.

Comparison of the mutation patterns between tumor tissue and cell-free DNA in stage IV gastric cancer.

Compared to stage I-III gastric cancer (GC), the level of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was significantly higher in stage IV GC. The mutation patterns of different metastatic patterns between cfDNA and tumor DNA in stage IV GC have not yet been reported. We used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze cfDNA and tumor DNA in 56 stage IV GC patients. Tumor DNA and cfDNA were analyzed using a 29-gene NGS panel. In tumor samples, the most commonly mutated gene was TP53 (64%), followed by ARID1A (62%), KMT2C (60%) and KMT2D (58%). In cfDNA samples, the most commonly mutated genes were FAT4 (19%) and MACF1 (19%), followed by KMT2D (18%), ARID1A (14%) and LRP1B (14%). The concordance of mutation patterns in these 29 genes was 42.0% between cfDNA and tumor DNA. A specificity of 100% was found when using the mutation status of cfDNA to predict mutations in tumor samples. The sensitivity of the mutation status of cfDNA to predict mutation in tumor samples was highest in FAT4 (88.9%), followed by MACF1 (80%), CDH1 (75%) and PLB1 (75%). For cfDNA with PLB1 mutations, patients were more likely to develop distant lymphatic metastasis than peritoneal metastasis. Patients with multiple-site metastases had significantly more mutated spots than patients with single-site metastasis. Due to the high sensitivity and specificity of some genes in the prediction of mutation in tumor samples, monitoring the mutation pattern of cfDNA may be useful in the stage IV GC treatment.

Elevated PD-L1 Expression and Microsatellite Instability in Elderly Patients With Gastric Cancer.

Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy is the current treatment of choice for frontline programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive gastric cancer. However, the best treatment strategy remains an unmet medical need for elderly or fragile patients with gastric cancer. Previous studies have revealed that PD-L1 expression, Epstein-Barr virus association, and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) are the potential predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy use in gastric cancer. In this study, we showed that PD-L1 expression, tumor mutation burden, and the proportion of MSI-H were significantly elevated in elderly patients with gastric cancer who were older than 70 years compared with patients younger than 70 years from analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas gastric adenocarcinoma cohort [≥70/<70: MSI-H: 26.8%/15.0%, P =0.003; tumor mutation burden: 6.7/5.1 Mut/Mb, P =0.0004; PD-L1 mRNA: 5.6/3.9 counts per million mapped reads, P =0.005]. In our real-world study, 416 gastric cancer patients were analyzed and showed similar results (≥70/<70: MSI-H: 12.5%/6.6%, P =0.041; combined positive score ≥1: 38.1%/21.5%, P <0.001). We also evaluated 16 elderly patients with gastric cancer treated with immunotherapy and revealed an objective response of 43.8%, a median overall survival of 14.8 months, and a median progression-free survival of 7.0 months. Our research showed that a durable clinical response could be expected when treating elderly patients with gastric cancer with immunotherapy, and this approach is worth further study.

A generational comparison for unfavorable cancer of unknown primary in a single institute over 20 years.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of unfavorable cancer of unknown primary is extremely poor. This is the first report to compared the treatment results between generations of CUP and examined prognostic factors. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study enrolled 68 patients with newly diagnosed unfavorable cancer of unknown primary at Taipei Veteran General Hospital from 2017 to 2020 as study cohort and 167 patients from 2000 to 2009 as historical cohort. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 4.3 months in the study cohort (95% CI, 2.7-6.2 months) and 4.5 months in the historical cohort (95% CI, 3.0-5.5 months; p = 0.858). Eleven patients in the study cohort received immunotherapy. The disease control rates were 45%. Multivariate analysis showed that an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score > 1 and a C-reactive protein level > 1 correlated with poor survival. A new prognostic stratification model was constructed by using Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score and C-reactive protein values. The good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups had distinct median overall survival of 18.3, 7.0 and 1.2 months, respectively (area under the curve, 0.817; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The outcome of unfavorable cancer of unknown primary has not changed much over the last 20 years. The application of a new prognostic stratification model can further stratify unfavorable cancer of unknown primary.

A G-quadruplex stabilizer, CX-5461 combined with two immune checkpoint inhibitors enhances in vivo therapeutic efficacy by increasing PD-L1 expression in colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone or in combination with chemotherapy can improve the limited efficacy of colorectal cancer (CRC) immunotherapy. CX-5461 causes substantial DNA damage and genomic instability and can increase ICIs' therapeutic efficacies through tumor microenvironment alteration. RESULTS: We analyzed whether CX-5461 enhances ICIs' effects in CRC and discovered that CX-5461 causes severe DNA damage, including cytosolic dsDNA appearance, in various human and mouse CRC cells. Our bioinformatics analysis predicted CX-5461-based interferon (IFN) signaling pathway activation in these cells, which was verified by the finding that CX-5461 induces IFN-α and IFN-ß secretion in these cells. Next, cGAMP, phospho-IRF3, CCL5, and CXCL10 levels exhibited significant posttreatment increases in CRC cells, indicating that CX-5461 activates the cGAS-STING-IFN pathway. CX-5461 also enhanced PD-L1 expression through STAT1 activation. CX-5461 alone inhibited tumor growth and prolonged survival in mice. CX-5461+anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 alone exhibited synergistic growth-suppressive effects against CRC and breast cancer. CX-5461 alone or CX-5461+anti-PD-1 increased cytotoxic T-cell numbers and reduced myeloid-derived suppressor cell numbers in mouse spleens. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, clinically, CX-5461 combined with ICIs for CRC therapy warrants consideration because CX-5461 can turn cold tumors into hot ones.

The clinicopathological and genetic differences among gastric cancer patients with no recurrence, early recurrence, and late recurrence after curative surgery.

BACKGROUND: To date, few reports have investigated the genetic alterations and clinicopathological features among gastric cancer (GC) patients with no tumor recurrence, early recurrence, and late recurrence following curative surgery. METHODS: A total of 473 GC patients undergoing curative surgery were included. The clinicopathological characteristics, patient prognosis, recurrence patterns, and genetic alterations were compared between GC patients with early recurrence and late recurrence. RESULTS: Among the 473 GC patients, 119 had early recurrence (<2 years) and 45 had late recurrence (≥2 years). Patients with early recurrence had tumor size larger than 5 cm, fewer superficial-type tumors, more lymphovascular invasion, more advanced pathological T and N categories and Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) stages, and worse 5-year overall survival than patients with late recurrence and no recurrence. For intestinal-type GC, patients with no tumor recurrence had more Helicobacter pylori infection than patients with early recurrence and late recurrence; for diffuse-type GC patients, the frequency of PIK3CA amplification was the highest in early recurrence, followed by late recurrence and no recurrence. GC patients with single-site recurrence had more ARID1A mutations than those with multiple-site recurrence. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age, tumor recurrence, and pathological N categories were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: PIK3CA amplifications were more common in diffuse-type GC with early recurrence, whereas ARID1A mutations were more common in patients with single-site recurrence. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy might be helpful for these patients.

Chimeric immune checkpoint protein vaccines inhibit the tumorigenesis and growth of rat cholangiocarcinoma.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primary liver malignancy and carries a dismal prognosis due to difficulties in achieving an optimal resection, and poor response to current standard-of-care systemic therapies. We previously devised a CTLA4-PD-L1 DNA cancer vaccine (DNA vaccine) and demonstrated its therapeutic effects on reducing tumor growth in a thioacetamide (TAA)-induced rat intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) model. Here, we developed a CTLA4-PD-L1 chimeric protein vaccine (Protein vaccine), and examined its effects in the rat iCCA model. In a therapeutic setting, iCCA-bearing rats received either DNA plus Protein vaccines or Protein vaccine alone, resulting in increased PD-L1 and CTLA-4 antibody titers, and reduced iCCA tumor burden as verified by animal positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Treating iCCA-bearing rats with Protein vaccine alone led to the increase of CTAL4 antibody titers that correlated with the decrease of tumor SUV ratio, indicating regressed tumor burden, along with increased <i>CD8</i> and granzyme A (<i>GZMA</i>) expression, and decreased PD-L1 expression on tumor cells. In a preventive setting, DNA or Protein vaccines were injected in rats before the induction of iCCA by TAA. Protein vaccines induced a more sustained PD-L1 and CTLA-4 antibody titers compared with DNA vaccines, and was more potent in preventing iCCA tumorigenesis. Correspondingly, Protein vaccines, but not DNA vaccines, downregulated PD-L1 gene expression and hindered the carcinogenesis of iCCA. Taken together, the CTLA4-PD-L1 chimeric protein vaccine may function both as a therapeutic cancer vaccine and as a preventive cancer vaccine in the TAA-induced iCCA rat model.

The immune microenvironment features and response to immunotherapy in EBV-associated lymphoepithelioma-like cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Limited data are available for tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated lymphoepithelioma-like cholangiocarcinoma (EBV-LELCC), a rare subtype of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC). We aimed to investigate TIME features in EBV-LELCC and the correlation between the components of TIME and the clinical outcomes. METHODS: Tumor tissues from five EBV-LELCC cases confirmed through EBER in situ hybridization and five stage-matched conventional IHCC (non-EBV IHCC) cases were collected. These samples were used to evaluate genetic alterations, TIME composition, and PD-L1 expression through ion AmpliSeq comprehensive cancer panel, PanCancer immune profiling panel, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence staining. The correlation between clinical outcomes and TIME components was analyzed in the two EBV-LELCC cases receiving anti-PD-1 treatment. RESULTS: The genetic mutations identified in EBV-LELCC were BARD1, CD19, CD79B, EPHA5, KDM5A, MUC6, MUC16, PTEN, RECQL4, TET1, and TNFAIP3. Both CD79B and TNFAIP3 mutations were involved in the NF-κB signaling pathway. PD-L1 was highly expressed in tumor-infiltrating immune cells, especially the T cells and macrophages. The TIME of EBV-LELCC displayed abundant immune cell infiltration with a stronger adaptive immune response. Increased Th1 cells, NK CD56dim cells, and M1 macrophages, decreased M2 macrophages, exhausted CD8 T cell infiltration, and increased T cell activation signatures in TIME were associated with longer survival. Two patients with metastatic EBV-LELCC had good disease control after anti-PD-1 antibody treatment. A significantly larger TIME component made EBV-LELCCs more sensitive to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). CONCLUSION: A better understanding of the composition of TIME in EBV-LELCC is critical for predicting the clinical outcomes of ICB treatment.

Impaired Chromatin Remodeling Predicts Better Survival to Modified Gemcitabine and S-1 plus Nivolumab in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Phase II T1219 Study.

PURPOSE: Modified gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) is an active regimen for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC) in our previous study. Herein, we report the results of a single-arm phase II of nivolumab plus modified GS (NGS) as first-line treatment in ABTC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received nivolumab 240 mg and 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine on day 1 plus daily 80/100/120 mg of S-1 (based on body surface area) on days 1 to 10, in a 2-week cycle. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The correlation between therapeutic efficacy and genetic alterations with signatures identified by targeted next-generation sequencing panels was explored. RESULTS: Between December 2019 and December 2020, 48 eligible patients were enrolled. After a median of 17.6 months of follow-up, the ORR was 45.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 31.4%-60.8%]. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 9.1 (95% CI, 5.8-9.6) and 19.2 (95% CI, 11.6-not reached) months, respectively. All grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AE) were less than 10%, except fatigue (14.6%) and skin rash (10.4%). Eighteen patients (35.4%) experienced immune-related AEs without treatment-related death. High tumor mutational burden (TMB-H; top 20%; ≥7.1 mut/Mb) only predicted prolonged median PFS but not OS. Up to 28.9% of patients who harbored loss-of-function mutations in chromatin remodeling genes demonstrated significantly longer median PFS and OS than those without alterations. CONCLUSIONS: NGS is a safe and promising regimen in ABTC. Impaired functions of chromatin remodeling genes may be a potential surrogate biomarker with predictive value in this study.

Novel immunoprofiling method for diagnosing SLE and evaluating therapeutic response.

OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis of SLE is based on clinical manifestations but is heterogeneous in early onset. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the feature of the immunoprofiling in patients with SLE and apply it to develop an immune signature algorithm for supporting SLE diagnosis. METHODS: We enrolled 13 newly diagnosed patients with SLE and 9 healthy controls (HCs) followed by analysing their immunoprofilings within their peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) through flow cytometry. The immunoprofiling from the patients with SLE and HCs were ranked and formed an immune signature score. Besides, we enrolled four patients with SLE and monitored the changes in their immunoprofilings after immunosuppressant treatment. RESULTS: Among 93 immune cell subsets, 29 differed significantly between patients with SLE and HCs, and lower dendritic and natural killer cell percentages and a higher CD8+ T-cell percentage were identified in patients with SLE. In an investigation of immune-tolerant-related cell subsets, higher concentrations of CD8+ regulatory natural killer T cells, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)+ T cells, and lower concentrations of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)+ PBMCs were observed in the SLE group. The immune signature score from patients with SLE was significantly different from that from the HCs. After treatment, the disease activity of the four patients were tended to stable and percentages of PD-L1+ monocytes, PD-1+ CD4 T and CD8 T cells in patients with SLE exhibited positively and negatively correlation with the SLEDAI-2K (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000) score, which might associate with the remission of SLE. CONCLUSIONS: The comparison of immunprofiling between patients with SLE and HCs exhibited a distinct pattern. This difference and its application to immune signature algorithm shed light on the studies of SLE pathogenesis and immune-based diagnostic tool development in the future.

Regorafenib inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and suppresses cholangiocarcinoma metastasis via YAP1-AREG axis.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a subtype of bile duct cancer usually diagnosed late with a low survival rate and no satisfactorily systemic treatment. Recently, regorafenib has been accepted as a second-line treatment for CCA patients. In this study, we investigated the potential signal transduction pathways mediated by regorafenib. We established a transcriptomic database for regorafenib-treated CCA cells using expression microarray chips. Our data indicate that regorafenib inhibits yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) activity in various CCA cells. In addition, we demonstrated that YAP1 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related genes, including E-cadherin and SNAI2. We further examined YAP1 activity, phosphorylation status, and expression levels of YAP1 downstream target genes in the regorafenib model. We found that regorafenib dramatically suppressed these events in CCA cells. Moreover, in vivo results revealed that regorafenib could significantly inhibit lung foci formation and tumorigenicity. Most importantly, regorafenib and amphiregulin (AREG) neutralize antibody exhibited synergistic effects against CCA cells. In a clinical setting, patients with high YAP1 and EMT expression had a worse survival rate than patients with low YAP1, and EMT expression did. In addition, we found that YAP1 upregulated the downstream target amphiregulin in CCA. Our findings suggest that AREG neutralizing antibody antibodies combined with regorafenib can reverse the CCA metastatic phenotype and EMT in vitro and in vivo. These findings provide novel therapeutic strategies to combat the metastasis of CCA.

Lenvatinib combined with nivolumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma-real-world experience.

Lenvatinib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor receptors pathway, activated the immune response in tumor microenvironment. However, the combination of lenvatinib and anti-PD-1 has been reported in early phase studies. Hence, this study aims to explore the efficacy and toxicity of lenvatinib combined with nivolumab in the real-world setting. Advanced HCC patients who underwent lenvatinib combined with nivolumab (L + N group) treatment at Taipei Veterans General Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan) were reviewed between January 2016 and December 2020. Treatment response and outcomes were collected and analyzed. A control group with lenvatinib (L group) was also included for comparison. Forty patients were included in L + N group and 47 in L group. The L + N group demonstrated a higher objective response rate than L group (45.0% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.03). The L + N group also achieved longer PFS (7.5 vs. 4.8 months, p = 0.05) and OS (22.9 vs. 10.3 months, p = 0.01) than L group. Patients with HBV infection and REFLECT criteria fit demonstrated a trend of better prognosis. The PFS for those with PR, SD and PD groups were 11.2, 6.4, and 2.2 months and OS were non-reached, 14.6 and 4.7 months, respectively. Portal vein thrombosis (HR 4.3, 95% C.I. 1.5-12.8) and AFP > 400 ng/mL (HR 3.3, 95% C.I. 1.1-9.3) were poor prognostic factors and nivolumab used remained a protective factor (HR 0.2, 95% C.I. 0.1-0.7). Dermatitis (35.0%), pruritis (27.5%), and hypothyroidism (27.5%) were the common toxicities. Few patients developed grade 3/4 toxicities, including dermatitis (15%), gastrointestinal bleeding (7.5%), hypertension (5.0%), pneumonitis (2.5%) and stomatitis (2.5%). This is the first real-world data reporting the promising efficacy and tolerable toxicities of lenvatinib combined with nivolumab in advanced HCC. Further randomized trials are prompted.

Anti-PD-1 combined sorafenib versus anti-PD-1 alone in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matching study.

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a role in the tumor microenvironment. Sorafenib, which inhibits the VEGF pathway, has an immune-modulation function but lacks substantial clinical data. This study aims to explore the efficacy of anti-PD-1 combined sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: HCC patients who underwent anti-PD-1 treatment at Taipei Veterans General Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan) between January 2016 and February 2019 were reviewed. The efficacy was compared between groups after propensity-score matching. RESULTS: There were 173 HCC patients receiving anti-PD-1. After excluding unsuitable cases, 140 patients were analyzed, of which 58 received combination therapy and 82 received anti-PD-1 alone. The combination therapy had a trend of higher CR rate (8.6% vs. 4.9%, ns.), ORR (22.4% vs. 19.5%, ns.) and significantly higher DCR (69.0% vs. 37.8%, p < 0.05) comparing to anti-PD-1 alone. After matching, combination group achieved longer progression-free survival (3.87 vs. 2.43 months, p < 0.05) and overall survival (not reached vs. 7.17 months, p < 0.05) than anti-PD-1 alone, without higher grade 3/4 AE (10.3% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.73). The tumor response varied among different metastatic sites, with high responses in adrenal glands, peritoneum and lungs. The more AFP declined (> 10, > 50 and > 66%), the higher the ORR (70, 80 and 92%) and CR rates (30, 35 and 58%) were achieved at day 28. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the combination of anti-PD-1 and sorafenib had better efficacy and survival benefit. A prospective randomized study is needed to confirm this finding.

Microsatellite Instability, Epstein-Barr Virus, and Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 as Predictive Markers for Immunotherapy in Gastric Cancer.

Immunotherapy benefits selected cases of gastric cancer (GC), but the correlation between biomarkers and prognosis is still unclear. Fifty-two patients with GC who underwent immunotherapy were enrolled from June 2016 to December 2020. Their clinical features and biomarkers-microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS), and Epstein-Barr encoding region (EBER)-were analyzed. Eight patients had MSI-H, five patients had EBER, 29 patients had CPS ≥ 1, and 20 patients had no biomarker. The overall response rates (ORRs) of the MSI-H, EBER, PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1, and all-negative group were 75%, 60%, 44.8%, and 15%, respectively. Compared with that of the all-negative group, progression-free survival (PFS) was better in the MSI-H (p = 0.018), CPS ≥ 5 (p = 0.012), and CPS ≥ 10 (p = 0.006) groups, but not in the EBER (p = 0.2) and CPS ≥ 1 groups (p = 0.35). Ten patients had combined biomarkers, CPS ≥ 1 with either MSI-H or EBER. The ORRs were 66.7% for CPS ≥ 1 and MSI-H and 75% for CPS ≥ 1 and EBER. PFS was better in patients with combined biomarkers (p = 0.01). MSI-H, EBER, and CPS are useful biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Case report: Acquired neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitor resistance in a patient with pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma receiving entrectinib.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (panNEC) is a rare disease. The rearrangements of neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) genes are oncogenic. And in the existed literatures, the prevalence of NTRK3 was only 0.1% in neuroendocrine tumors. NTRK inhibitor was approved for refractory and recurrence NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors did not respond to standard treatment. We described a patient with panNEC who was confirmed to have ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene by liquid biopsy. The patient initially responded well to entrectinib, a first-generation NTRK inhibitor, but developed resistance with two acquired NTRK3-G623R and NTRK3-G623E mutations detected by a second liquid biopsy. Kirsten rat sarcoma vial oncogene (KRAS) K117N mutation was found initially but became undetectable after resistance. This was the first report demonstrating the novel agent, entrectinib, used for the NTRK3-fusion gene found by the liquid biopsy in panNEC. Our report provides evidence of not only the effectiveness but also the acquired resistance of entrectinib. Also, we highlighted the potential role of genomic sequencing after entrectinib failure. Furthermore, liquid biopsy should be considered if acquiring tissue from the patient is challenging. Further studies regarding NTRK inhibitors in panNEC were needed.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: An Analysis of a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Database.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary management strategies are standard in esophageal cancer. Based on a multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) database in a high-volume center, we aimed to evaluate real-world treatment patterns and patient outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. In addition, we determined the impact of MTB discussions on patient prognosis. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The pattern of treatment modalities and overall survival (OS) of patients with limited, locally advanced, and advanced/metastatic disease were reported. RESULTS: Data from 1132 patients, including 247 patients with limited esophageal cancer, 606 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, and 279 patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer were included. Upfront surgery was the most common (56.3%) treatment modality for patients with limited esophageal cancer, while treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer included upfront surgery (19.1%), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (44.9%), and definitive chemoradiotherapy (36.0%); however, 27.9% of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy did not receive planned esophagectomy. Definitive chemoradiotherapy was mainly used for patients with locally advanced and advanced/metastatic disease, but had an incompletion rate of 22.0% and 33.7%, respectively. Regarding survival, the 5-year OS rates were 56.4%, 26.3%, and 5.1% in patients with limited, locally advanced, and advanced/metastatic disease, respectively. Additionally, patients whose clinical management was discussed in the MTB had a significantly better 5-year OS rate than the other patients (27.3% vs. 20.5%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We report the real-world data of treatment patterns and patient outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer with respect to multidisciplinary management, and demonstrate the positive impact of MTB discussions on patient prognosis.